NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Whiteley v Hodge [2000] NSWSC 1161 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2051/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 5 December 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 December 2000
PARTIES : Mely Meia Whiteley (P) Russell John Hodge (D) JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton J
COUNSEL : T A Kolomyjec (P) A K Ottesen (D) SOLICITORS : Virginia Odtojan & Associates (P) Owen Hodge Lawyers (D) CATCHWORDS : INTEREST [5] - Recoverability of interest - Award of interest as damages - Up to judgment - General principles - Supreme Court Act 1970 s 94 - In "proceedings for recovery of any money" - Proceedings for declaration of sum repayable under mortgage - What are - INTEREST [21] - Where equitable relief or fiduciary relationship - Where contract displays intent that no interest be paid. LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Act s 94 Bloch v Bloch (1981) 180 CLR 390 Brennan v Kinjella Pty Ltd (No 2) SCNSW 20 July 1993 Young J unreported Mendl v Smith (1943) 112 LJ Ch 279 CASES CITED : Piper Industries Pty Ltd v Hemphill (No 2) SCNSW 20 June 1989 Young J unreported Piper Industries Pty Ltd v Hemphill SCNSW 8 June 1989 Young J unreported Whiteley v Hodge [2000] NSWSC 866 Williams v Vicroft Pty Ltd SCNSW 31 May 1989 Powell J unreported DECISION : That there be no order for the payment of interest.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
HAMILTON J
THURSDAY, 7 DECEMBER 2000
2051/00 MELY MEIA WHITELEY v RUSSELL JOHN HODGE - EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF GWENDOLINE DAISY WHITELEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate