NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2001) 37 ACSR 672 (2001) 19 ACLC 856
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Fexuto Pty Limited v Bosnjak Holdings Pty Limited & Ors [2001] NSWCA 97 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40898/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 28,29,30,31 August 2000 1 September 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 April 2001
PARTIES : Fexuto Pty Limited v Bosnjak Holdings Pty Limited; Slavko James Joseph Bosnjak; Carol Lynette Bosnjak; Feyama Pty Limited; Fexule Pty Limited; National Bus Company Pty Limited; Torsby Pty Limited; Flaren Pty Limited; Bosnjak Property Developments Pty Limited; Westbus Pty Limited; Bosnjak Investments Pty Limited; Bosnjak Coach Lines Pty Limited; St Marys Bus Services Pty Limited; Parramatta Bus Company Pty Limited; Bosnjak Bros Pty Limited; Bosnjak Enterprises Pty Limited; Bosnjak International Sales Pty Limited; Smithfield Coach Imports Pty Limited; Westbus (UK) Limited (Cross appeal) Slavko James Joseph Bosnjak; Carol Lynette Bosnjak; Feyama Pty Limited; Fexule Pty Limited; National Bus Company Pty Limited; Torsby Pty Limited; Flaren Pty Limited v Fexuto Pty Limited; Bosnjak Group Pty Ltd JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Priestley JA at 218; Fitzgerald JA at 586
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court - Equity Division LOWER COURT ED 3799/97 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Young J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
Appellant/Cross respondents - R.J. Ellicott QC / V.F. Kerr COUNSEL : Respondents (2-8)/Cross appellants - M. Pembroke SC / J. Stevenson / N. Beaumont Respondents (1 & 9-20) - G.C. Lindsay SC / G.O. Blake (Submitting except as to costs) Appellant/Cross respondents - Piper Alderman SOLICITORS : Respondents (2-8)/Cross appellants - Atanaskovic Hartnell Respondents (1 & 9-20) - Freehill, Hollingdale & Page CATCHWORDS : Corporations Law - oppression - exclusion from day to day management - "legitimate expectation" - Corporations Law, s260 - Corporations Law - oppression - remedies - Corporations Law - directors' duties - need for "fully informed consent" to absolve a breach of fiduciary duty Companies Act 1948 (UK) Company Law Review Act 1998 LEGISLATION CITED : Corporate Law Economic Reform Program Act 1999 Corporations Law Freedom of Information Act 1989 Uniform Companies Act 1961 Atwood v Maude (1868) LR 3 Ch App 369 Beach Petroleum NL v Kennedy (1999) 48 NSWLR 1 Belgiorno-Zegna v Exben Pty Ltd (2000) 35 ACSR 305 Blisset v Daniel (1853) 10 Hare 493; 68 ER 1022 Bosnjak's Bus Service Pty Ltd v Commissioner for Motor Transport (1970) 92 WN(NSW) 1003 Brickenden v London Loan & Savings Co [1934] 3 DLR 465 Calabro Bros Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Motor Transport (Mahoney J, 6 April 1973, unreported) Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Smith (1991) 42 FCR 390 Drinan v Drinan (1908) SR (NSW) 109 Ebrahimi v Westbourne Galleries Ltd [1973] AC 360 Foss v Harbottle (1843) 2 Hare 461; 67 ER 109 Furs Ltd v Tomkies (1936) 54 CLR 583 Guerinoni v Argyle Concrete & Quarry Supplies Pty Ltd (2000) 34 ACSR 469 In re a Company (No 002567 of 1982) [1983] 1 WLR 927 In re Astec (VSR) plc [1998] 2 BCLC 556 In re Pauling's Settlement Trusts [1962] 1 WLR 86 In re Smith & Fawcett Ltd [1942] Ch 304 In re Wondoflex Textiles Pty Ltd [1951] VLR 458 In re Yenidge Tobacco Company Ltd [1916] 2 Ch 426 Knight v Bell (1887) 13 VLR 878 Latec Investments Ltd v Hotel Terrigal Pty Ltd (in liq) (1965) 113 CLR 265 Lyle & Scott Ltd v Scott's Trustee [1959] AC 763 CASES CITED: McMillan v Toledo Enterprises Pty Ltd (1995) 18 ACSR 603 Maguire v Makaronis (1996) 188 CLR 459 Morgan v 45 Flers Avenue Pty Ltd (1996) 10 ACLR 692 O'Halloran v R.T. Thomas & Family Pty Ltd (1998) 45 NSWLR 262 O'Neill v Phillips [1999] 1 WLR 1092 Phipps v Boardman [1965] Ch 992 Phipps v Boardman [1967] 2 AC 46 Queensland Mines Ltd v Hudson (1978) 53 ALJR 399 R & H Electric Ltd v Haden Bill Electrical Ltd [1995] 2 BCLC 280 Re a Company (No 00789 of 1987); ex parte Shooter [1990] BCLC 384 Re Blue Arrow plc [1987] BCLC 585 Re Brenfield Squash Rackets Club Ltd [1996] 2 BCLC 184 Re M Dalley & Co Pty Ltd (1968) 1 ACLR 489 Re Posgate and Denby (Agencies) Ltd [1987] BCLC 8 Re Saul D. Harrison & Sons plc [1995] 1 BCLC 14 Redwood v Redwood (1909) 28 NZLR 260 at 261 Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1967] 2 AC 134n Scottish Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd v Meyer [1959] AC 324 Spellson v George (1992) 26 NSWLR 666 Tay Bok Choon v Tahansan SDN BHD [1987] 1 WLR 413 Vadasz v Pioneer Concrete (SA) Pty Ltd (1995) 184 CLR 102 Walden Properties Ltd v Beaver Properties Pty Ltd [1973] 2 NSWLR 815 Warman International Ltd v Dwyer (1994-1995) 182 CLR 544 DECISION : 1. Appeal allowed.; 2. Cross-appeal dismissed.; 3. Orders of trial judge dated 4 November 1998 varied as follows:; (a) Substitute the date 42 days from the date of formal entry of these orders for the date 18 November 1998 wherever it appears in Orders. 2 and 3.; (b) Substitute the date 28 August, 1997 for the date 10 January 1994 in Order 8(b).; 4. Orders of trial judge of 26 November 1998 varied by substituting 2/3 for 50 percent in Order 1.; 5. Order the Respondents to pay 2/3 of the Appellant's costs of the appeal and cross-appeal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate