NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Haines [2001] NSWCCA 111 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60272/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 23 March 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 30 March 2001
PARTIES : Regina v Jade Andrew Haines JUDGMENT OF : Studdert J at 1; Barr J at 40
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 98/31/0164 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Kinchington DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : W.L. Robinson QC (Crown) T.J. Golding (Applicant) SOLICITORS : S.E. O'Connor (Crown) D.J. Humphreys (Applicant)
LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act R v Ehrenburg (unreported, NSWCCA, 14 December 1990) Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606 CASES CITED: Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 71 ALJR 875 R v Diamond (unreported, NSWCCA, 18 February 1993) R v Reardon (1996) 89 A Crim R 180 DECISION : Appeal allowed
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
60272/00
STUDDERT J BARR J
Friday 30 March 2001
REGINA v JADE ANDREW HAINES
JUDGMENT
1 STUDDERT J: Jade Andrew Haines pleaded guilty before his Honour Judge Kinchington QC to two charges of robbery in company, one charge of stealing from the person and one charge of cultivating a prohibited plant. The judge imposed sentences as follows:
- for the two offences of robbery in company, sentences of five years six months to be served concurrently, with a minimum term of two years six months to commence on 7 March 2000;
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate