NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Westpac v Bagshaw & Anor [2000] NSWSC 650 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 11751/94 HEARING DATE(S) : 30-31 May 2000, 1-2,5-6 June 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 July 2000
Westpac Banking Corporation (Plaintiff)
v PARTIES : Leith Gordon Bagshaw (First Defendant)
Judith Hampton Bagshaw (Second Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Davies AJ
P: Mr S A Gregory COUNSEL : 1D: No Appearance 2D: Mr G Stevens P: Henry Davis York SOLICITORS : 1D: In person 2D: Richard A Licardy & Co CATCHWORDS : Mortgage - whether executed on misrepresentation - whether executed in presence of bank officers - whether mortgage security for moneys owing - whether moneys lent to others without authority - whether partnership - whether misleading and deceptive conduct - whether unjust contract - whether enforcement of mortgage unconscionable Supreme Court Rules, Pt7r8 LEGISLATION CITED : Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 52, 87 Contracts Review Act 1980, s 6 NZI Capital Corporation Ltd v Fulton (Federal Court, Black CJ, Davies and Lehane JJ, unrep, 10/6/98) CASES CITED : Yerkey v Jones (1939) 63 CLR 649 Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447 Garcia v National Australia Bank Ltd (1998) 194 CLR 395 DECISION : See paragraphs 50-52
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate