NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : BAR ASSOCIATION OF NEW SOUTH WALES v T [2001] NSWCA 316 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40060/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 5 September 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 2 October 2001
PARTIES : Bar Association of New South Wales - Claimant T - Opponent JUDGMENT OF : Priestley JA at 1; Sheller JA at 2; Fitzgerald AJA at 34
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Administrative Decisions Tribunal LOWER COURT ADT 92/99 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT N/A JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : J C Campbell QC - Claimant P LeG Brereton SC - Opponent SOLICITORS : Colin Biggers & Paisley - Claimant Makinson & d'Apice - Opponent CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - jurisdiction of Administrative Decisions Tribunal - whether Tribunal had jurisdiction over a complaint against a barrister filed in 1993 - interpretation of clauses 30(2) and 31(1) of the Legal Profession Regulation 1994. Legal Profession Act 1987 Legal Profession Reform Act 1993 LEGISLATION CITED : Legal Profession Regulation 1994 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Administrative Decisions Legislation Amendment Act No 77 of 1997 CASES CITED: Council of the Law Society of NSW v Nutt (unreported) NSWCA 24 August 1995 Garnham v Tessier (1959) 27 WWR 682 DECISION : The Court makes the following declaration ; A declaration that the Administrative Decisions Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear and determine the complaint being Complaint No 6 of 1993 filed by the plaintiff against the defendant in the Legal Profession Disciplinary Tribunal on 17 March 1993.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate