NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Ell v Cisera [2001] NSWSC 242 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2016/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 6, 9, 18-20 October and 10 November 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 4 April 2001
PARTIES : Richard Ell t/as GNP Printing (P) Dino Cisera (D) JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton J
COUNSEL : H Thurairajah, Sol (P) D L Oliveri, Sol (D) SOLICITORS : Thurai Rajah Lawyers (P) Oliveri Solicitors (D) CATCHWORDS : LANDLORD AND TENANT [19] - Duration of term - Holding over after expiry of term - Holding over from month to month - Terms of holding over - Applicability of lease - Proviso for re-entry on non payment of rent for 14 days - Whether applicable. Bowes v Croll (1856) 6 E & B 255; 119 ER 859 Bradbury v Grimble & Co [1920] 2 Ch 548 Cole v Kelly [1920] 2 KB 106 Ell v Cisera [2000] NSWSC 768 Ell v Cisera [2000] NSWSC 961 Elrington v Judd (1964) 64 SR (NSW) 150 CASES CITED : Glenbond Pty Ltd v The International House Pty Ltd NSWSC Young J 22 June 1988 unreported Haldane v Johnson (1853) 8 Ex 689; 155 ER 1529 W D Duncan, Commercial Leases in Australia (3rd ed, 1998) 79, 318 Hill & Redman's Law of Landlord and Tenant A[206] Andrew Lang, Leases and Tenancies in New South Wales (1976) [1203] Redfern & Cassidy, Australian Tenancy Practice and Precedents [30 65] Woodfall's Law of Landlord and Tenant (1994) [7.094] DECISION : Lease forfeited by re-entry.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate