NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Hofer [2001] NSWCCA 544 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60421/2001 HEARING DATE(S) : 14 December 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 14 December 2001
PARTIES : Regina Rudolph Hofer JUDGMENT OF : Wood CJ at CL at 1, 39; Sperling J at 38
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 01/31/0084 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Coolahan DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : G E Smith PJD Hamill SOLICITORS : S E O'Connor D J Humphreys CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against severity of sentence - supply of methylamphetamine - possession of cannabis - earlier offence inappropriately taken into account during sentence - double jeopardy principle - error on the face of the record - Use of Judicial Commission Statistics for comparison with like offences - existing sentence excessive to a small degree only. LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912, s 6(3) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985, s 25A Regina v Bacon (2000) NSWCCA 549 Regina v Barton (2001) NSWCCA 63 Regina v Bloomfield NSWCCA 15 July 1998) Regina v Carter (2000) NSWCCA 490 Regina v Daridis NSWCCA 18 December 1986 Regina v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383 R v Groat (2001) NSWCCA 452 Regina v Hayes (2001) NSWCCA 410 Regina v Hoon and Pouoa (2000) NSWCCA 137 CASES CITED: Regina v Huang and Lin (2001) NSWCCA 76 Regina v Khaled (2001) NSWCCA 169 Regina v McMahon NSWCCA 4 April 1986 Regina v Nuth (2001) NSWCCA 318 R v Ryan (2001) 75 ALJR 815 at para 67 Regina v Smiroldo (2000) NSWCCA 120 Regina v Tannous NSWCCA 18 June 1997 Regina v Thompson (2000) NSWCCA 362 Regina v Tipler (2000) NSWCCA 382 Regina v Tran (1990) NSWCCA 109 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted. Appeal allowed. Sentence below quashed. New sentence of 4 years imprisonment, commencing 9 November 2000 and expiring on 8 November 2004.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate