NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Geiger [2001] NSWCCA 140 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60645/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 11 April 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 April 2001
PARTIES : Regina v Hank Stephen Geiger JUDGMENT OF : Wood CJ at CL at 1, 28; Smart AJ at 2
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 00/41/0043; 99/41/0264 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Phelan DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : (A) M Thangaraj (R) M Grogan SOLICITORS : (A) D J Humphreys (R) S E O'Connor CATCHWORDS : Sentencing - parity - different factors applicable to each offender - lesser sentence not permissible LEGISLATION CITED : Nil CASES CITED: Regina v Doan 2000 NSW CCA 317 Regina v Capper 1993 69 A Crim R 64 at 75 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted - appeal dismissed
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
60645/00 WOOD CJ AT CL SMART AJ Wednesday 11 April 2001 REGINA v HANK STEPHEN GEIGER JUDGMENT
1 WOOD CJ AT CL : I will ask Smart AJ to give the first judgment.
2 SMART AJ : Hank Stephen Geiger seeks leave to appeal against the severity of sentences imposed upon him in the District Court. On a charge that at Queanbeyan on 7 September 1999 he had in his possession a Commodore sedan stolen outside New South Wales and in the Australian Capital Territory, he was sentenced to a fixed term of imprisonment of 12 months. On charges of take and drive a conveyance on 10 March 1999 and break, enter and steal, on that day he was sentenced on each charge to three years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 15 months. Two offences of fail to appear were taken into account. All sentences dated from 5 April 2000. The point at issue is one of parity having regard to the sentence imposed on the applicant and Mark Douglas Cross, a co-offender.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate