NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : REGINA v MARINELLIS [2001] NSWCCA 328 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60805/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 6 July 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 6 July 2001
PARTIES : The Crown Nikolaos Marinellis (Appl) JUDGMENT OF : Studdert J at 47; McClellan J at 1
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 98/11/0420 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Bell DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : D M Woodburne (Crown) P J D Hamill (Appl) SOLICITORS : S E O'Connor (Crown) D J Humphreys (Appl) CATCHWORDS : SENTENCING - appeal against sentence - s 319 Crimes Act 1900 doing an act with the intent to pervert the course of justice - case where a custodal sentence was required LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900, s 319 Kellow and Townsend [1980] 4 Crim LJ 55 R v Nomchong, NSWCCA, unreported, 10 April 1987 R v Irwin [1999] NSWCCA 361 R v Hani Taouk (1993) 65 A Crim R 387 R v Jordan, NSWCCA, unreported, 3 November 1997 CASES CITED: R v Purtell [2001] NSWCCA 21 R v Meissner, NSWCCA, unreported, 27 November 1992 R v Chapman NSWCCA, unreported, 21 May 1998 R v Bayeh [1999] NSWCCA 82 R v Karageorge [1999] NSWCCA 17 R v Lilley [2000] NSWCCA 57 R v Zreika [2000] NSWCCA 75 DECISION : See para 46
IN THE COURT OF
CRIMINAL APPEAL
No 60805/00
STUDDERT J McCLELLAN J
FRIDAY, 6 JULY 2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate