NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Lowe v Lang [2000] NSWSC 307 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1082/96 HEARING DATE(S) : 28 March 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 28 March 2000
Michael Campbell Lowe (P) PARTIES : Barry Arthur Lang (D1) Erolgreen Pty Ltd (D2) JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton J
COUNSEL : P T Taylor (P) P J Deakin QC and P R Stockley (D1 & 2) SOLICITORS : Baldock Stacy & Niven (P) Kenny Spring (D1 & 2) CATCHWORDS : EVIDENCE [72], [75] - Facts excluded from proof - On grounds of privilege - Professional confidence - Legal profession - General principles - Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) - Privilege at common law - Waiver of privilege - Extent of disclosure required when party puts privileged material into evidence. LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 ss 36 & 122 (2) & (4) Supreme Court Rules Pt 23 r 1 & Pt 37 r 10 Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd v Spalvins (1998) 81 FCR 371 Attorney-General (NT) v Maurice (1986) 161 CLR 475 Benecke v National Australia Bank (1993) 35 NSWLR 110 Derby & Co Ltd v Weldon (No 10) [1991] 1 WLR 660 Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 74 ALJR 339 General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation Ltd v Tanter (The Zephyr) [1984] 1 WLR 100 CASES CITED : Geo Doland Ltd v Blackburn Robson Coates & Co [1972] 1 WLR 1338 Lowe v Lang [2000] NSWSC 302 Northern Territory v GPAO (1999) 73 ALJR 470 Telstra Corporation Ltd v BT Australasia Pty Ltd (1998) 85 FCR 152 Trade Practices Commission v Sterling (1979) 36 FLR 244 Phipson on Evidence (14th Ed, 1990) par 20-37 8 Wigmore on Evidence (McNaughton rev, 1961) par 2327 DECISION : Application for inspection of documents refused.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate