NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Vitali v Stachnik [2001] NSWSC 303 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1484/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 20/04/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 20 April 2001
PARTIES : Johan Hendrik Berhat Vitali - Plaintiff Elizabeth Joanna Stachnik JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
COUNSEL : Mr B.J. Knox - Plaintiff Ms L.M. Snelling - Defendant SOLICITORS : Ellington Boardman Allport - Plaintiff Claire & Associates - Defendant CATCHWORDS : Admissibility of documents- business records - whether prepared or obtained "for the purpose of" or "in connection with" proceeding - discretion to reject evidence if admission "unfairly prejudicial". LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 National Australia Bank Ltd v Rusu (1999) 47 NSWLR 309 Penrith City Council v Penrith Waste Services Pty Ltd, Land and Environment Court, 24 October 1995 Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services [2000] NSWSC 425 Sellers Fabrics Pty Ltd v Hapag-Lloyd AG [1998] NSWSC 644 CASES CITED : Buckland v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1960) AITR 66 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297 Ordukaya v Hicks [2000] NSWSC 180 ACCC v Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1269 R v Toki [2000] NSWSC 999 DECISION : MFI 2 rejected. MFI 3 admitted.
THE SUPREME COURT REVISED OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
BARRETT J
FRIDAY, 20 APRIL 2001
1484/1999 - JOHAN VITALI v ELIZABETH STACHNIK
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate