NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Bicer v McDonalds Australia Ltd [2001] NSWSC 218 revised - 3/04/2001 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20419/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 14, 15, 16, 19 and 20 February 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 30 March 2001
Veli Bicer (Plaintiff)
PARTIES : McDonalds Australia Limited (Defendant/Cross claimant)
Therma Truck Pty Limited (Cross defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison
Mr J Drummond with Mr S McCarthy COUNSEL : (Defendant/Cross Claimant)
Mr J Sexton SC (Cross Defendant) Herbert Geer & Rundle (Defendant/Cross Claimant) SOLICITORS : Moray & Agnew (Cross Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Cross claim - recovery proceedings - employer - manufacturer Trade Practices Act Sales of Goods Act LEGISLATION CITED : Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act Limitation Act 1969 Compensation to Relatives Act 1897 Supreme Court Act Bull v Rover Motors (Aust) Pty Ltd [1984] 2 QdR 489 Voli v inglewood Shire Council (1963) 110 CLR 74 Griffiths v Arch Engineering Co Ltd [1968] 3 All ER 217 Poole v Crittal Metal Windows [1964] NZLR 522 (CA) Waddams, Products Liability (2nd ed 1980, Carswell) Miller, Product Liability (1977, Butterworths) Newdick, The Future of Negligence in Product Liability (1987) 103 LQR 288 Suosaari v Steinhardt (1989) 2 QdR 477 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 CASES CITED : Jaensch v Coffey (1984) 155 CLR 549 McDonnell & East Limited v McGregor (1936) 56 CLR 57 Sidney Raper Pty Limited v Commonwealth Trading Bank of Australia [1975] 2 NSWLR 227 Henriksens Roder A/S v THZ Rolimpex (the Brede) [1974] QB 233 Codelfa Constructions Pty Limited v STate Rail Authority of NSW (1982) 149 CLR 337 Adelaide Chemical & Fertilizer Co Ltd v Carlyle [1940] 64 CLR 521 Australian Shipbuilding Industries (WA) Pty Limited v Packer & Ors (1993) 3 WAR 375 Martin V Stratman & Anor (1994) ATR 61,051 Robinson v Halvorsen Boats Pty Ltd ("The Kangaroo") (1990) ATR 81,042 Podrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Limited (1984-85) 59 ALR 529 Wynbergen v Hoyts Corporation Pty Limited (1997) 149 ALR 25 DECISION : (1) The defendant contribute 70% of the amount of damages payable to the plaintiff and the cross defendant contribute 30% of the amount of damages payable to the plaintiff; (2) The question of costs is reserved for further argument.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate