NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Sky Channel Pty Ltd v Tszyu [2000] NSWSC 838 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1175/2000 HEARING DATE(S) : 03/08/2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 24 August 2000
PARTIES : Sky Channel Pty Limited (Plaintiff/Respondent) Konstantin Tszyu (Defendant/Appellant) JUDGMENT OF : Young J
LOWER COURT Supreme Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 1175/2000 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Master McLaughlin JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : P M Wood (Plaintiff/Respondent) M Aldridge SC and B Morris (Defendant/Appellant) SOLICITORS : Verekers (Plaintiff/Respondent) Benjamin & Khoury (Defendant/Appellant) CATCHWORDS : EQUITY [13]- Contribution- Co-ordinate liabilities- Plaintiff held liable in tort to F- Defendant held liable to F in contract for same amount- F gets judgment against both for same amount on basis that F will only be paid once- Plaintiff pays F- Whether plaintiff can recover contribution from defendant. LEGISLATION CITED : Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1946 Adamson v Jarvis (1827) 4 Bing 66; 130 ER 693 Albion Insurance Co Ltd v Government Insurance Office of NSW (1969) 121 CLR 342 Armstrong v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (1967) 69 SR (NSW) 38 Blois v Blois (1680) 2 Vent 347; 86 ER 478 BP Petroleum Development Ltd v Esso Petroleum Co Ltd [1987] SLT 345 Caldedonian Railway Co v Colt (1860) 3 MacQueen 833 Dall v The Blue Wren Taxi Co Pty Ltd [1926] VLR 365 Davenport v Commissioner for Railways (1953) 53 SR 552 Dering v Winchelsea (Earl) (1787) 1 Cox Eq 318; 29 ER 1184 Dorgal Holdings Pty Ltd v Buckley (1996) 22 ACSR 164 JF Elkins Construction Co v Naill Bros 76 SW (2d) 326 (1934) Ellesmere Brewery Co v Cooper [1896] 1 QB 75 The Englishman and The Australia [1895] P 212 Re EWA (A Debtor) [1901] 2 KB 642 CASES CITED : Fightvision Pty Ltd v Onisforou (1999) 47 NSWLR 473 Hanave Pty Ltd v Lfot Pty Ltd (1999) 168 ALR 318 Jones v Mortgage Acceptance Nominees Ltd (1996) 63 FCR 418 McConnell v Lynch-Robinson [1957] NI 70 McLaren Maycroft & Co v Fletcher Development Co Ltd [1973] 2 NZLR 100 Merryweather v Nixan (1799) 8 Tr 186; 101 ER 1337 Palmer v Wick & Pulteneytown Steam Shipping Co Ltd [1894] AC 318 Philips v Biggs (1659) Hardres 164; 145 ER 433 Spika Trading Pty Ltd v Harrison (1990) 10 NSWLR 211 Staples v Baker [1999] 1 Qd R 317 Street v Retravision (NSW) Pty Ltd (1995) 56 FCR 588 Thompson v Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd (1996) 186 CLR 574 Trade Practices Commission v Manfal Pty Ltd (No 3) (in liq) (1991) 33 FCR 382 Windsor SC v Enoggera Divisional Board [1902] St R Qd 23 Wolmerhausen v Gullick [1893] 2 Ch 514 DECISION : Appeal dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate