NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [2000] NSWSC 69 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20223 of 1995; 20592 of 1996 HEARING DATE(S) : 18 February 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 18 February 2000
JOHN MARSDEN (Plaintiff)
PARTIES : v
AMALGAMATED TELEVISION SERVICES PTY LIMITED (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Levine J
M Hall (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : R Stitt Q.C. (Defendant) Phillips Fox (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Mallesons Stephen Jaques (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Access to "police" documents - T4114 DECISION : See paragraph 3
DLJT: 95 (Ex Tempore - Revised) THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION DEFAMATION LIST No. 20223 of 1995 No. 20592 of 1996
JUSTICE DAVID LEVINE
FRIDAY 18 FEBRUARY 2000
JOHN MARSDEN (Plaintiff)
v
AMALGAMATED TELEVISION SERVICES PTY LIMITED ACN 000 145 246 (Defendant)
JUDGMENT (Access to " police " documents - T4114)
1 HIS HONOUR: In relation to the police documents, referred to before lunch, I have photocopied four pages as indicated, one of which has been edited. 2 The documents, when handed down, of course, will probably make little sense without the legal advisers having access to the original material from which each is produced. That can be cured by the legal advisers. 3 The restricted access documents will be handed down. The copied documents are available for inspection by the legal advisers and their clients. ***********
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate