NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : R v Hyland, Parry, Yates, Powick and Wall [2001] NSWSC 470 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 70012/00; 70201/00; 70202/00; 70066/00; 70067/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 29 January 2001 to 7 June 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 June 2001
Director of Public Prosecutions Dean William Hyland PARTIES : Robert Owen Parry Barry James Yates Bradley Thomas Powick Darren Russell Wall JUDGMENT OF : Ireland AJ
Mr M Macadam QC with Mr T Hardman for the Crown Mr J Fitzgerald for Hyland COUNSEL : Mr W Warwick for Parry Mr M Austin for Yates Mr R Cruickshank for Powick Mr G Graham for Wall SOLICITORS : CATCHWORDS : Reasons for Sentence - Murder - Home Invasion in circumstances of special aggravation - Accessory after the fact to murder - Incitment to pervert the course of justice - Whether worst case category - Whether warranting imprisonment for life LEGISLATION CITED : The Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1995 R v Rushby (1977) 1 NSWLR 594 R v Purdy (1992) A Crim.R 441 Ibbs v The Queen (1987) 163 CLR 447 R v Holden and Johnstone (1983) 3 NSWLR 245 CASES CITED : R v Vusumuzi Twala (NSWCCA 14.11.94 unreported) Veen v The Queen (No.2) (1987-1988) 164 CLR 465 R v Harris (2000) NSWCCA 469 R v Garforth (NSWCCA 23.5.94 unreported) Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 DECISION : Sentences as per reasons.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate