NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v S R Kessey [2001] NSWCCA 469 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60617/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 23/11/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 23 November 2001
PARTIES : Regina (Appellant) Scott Richard Kessey (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Giles JA at 45; Sully J at 46; Kirby J at 1
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 00/41/0064; 00/11/0415 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Norrish DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : L M B Lamprati (Crown/Appellant) A C Haesler (Respondent) SOLICITORS : S E O'Connor (Crown/Appellant) South Eastern Aboriginal Legal Service (Respondent) CATCHWORDS : Crown Appeal - Findings of facts by sentencing Judge - Victim Impact Statement - Whether sentence manifestly inadequate LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act, 1999 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 R v Ponfield (1999) 48 NSWLR 327 R v Thomson & Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 Wong & Leung v The Queen [2001] HCA 64 R v Pont [2000] NSWCCA 419 R v Jurisic (1998) 45 NSWLR 209 Regina v Hayes (1987) 29 A Crim R 452 CASES CITED: R v Morrow [1999] NSWCCA 64 R v Holder [1983] 3 NSWLR 245 R v Allpass (1994) 72 A Crim R 561 Regina v Houghton [2000] NSWCCA 62 R v Kalache [2000] NSWCCA 2 R v Brewster (1998) 1 Cr App R 220 Deakin v The Queen (1984) 54 ALR 765 Bugmy v The Queen (1990) 169 CLR 525 DECISION : Appeal allowed.; Convictions quashed.; Respondent resentenced.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate