NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 123 A Cim R 30 53 NSWLR 480
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Phan [2001] NSWCCA 29 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60356/2000 HEARING DATE(S) : 16/02/2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 4 June 2001
PARTIES : Regina Vinh Ngoc Phan JUDGMENT OF : Wood CJ at CL at 1; McClellan J at 87; Smart AJ at 88
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 70090/98 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Sully J OFFICER :
COUNSEL : M. Grogan for Crown G D Wendler for Applicant SOLICITORS : S.E. O'Connor Van Houten CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - appeals - appeal against conviction - murder - directions to jury - discretion to exclude evidence - whether summing up unbalanced - whether necessary to give instructions on alternative verdict of manslaughter - criminal responsibility - distinction between common purpose and joint criminal enterprise - whether principal in second degree - whether mere presence enough to be guilty of murder - miscarriage of justice Crimes Act 1900 Part 10A LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 ss 90, 138 Jury Act 1977 s 54 DECISION : (1) Appeal against conviction allowed.; (2) Conviction and sentence quashed and a new trial ordered.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
No. 60356 of 2000
WOOD CJ at CL McClellan J Smart AJ MONDAY 4TH JUNE 2001 Regina v PHAN
The appellant was convicted of murder. He was sentenced to imprisonment for fourteen years with a non-parole period of ten years and nine weeks.
He appealed against the conviction on the grounds that (1) the trial judge failed to give a formal order in compliance with s 54 Jury Act; (2) the trial judge's directions could not remedy a prejudicial remark made by the Crown prosecutor; (3) the summing up was unbalanced; (4) the trial judge failed to give instructions on an alternative verdict of manslaughter; (5) the trial judge erred in admitting the appellant's ERISP into evidence; (6) the trial judge's directions in relation to the liability of the appellant as a principal in the second degree were erroneous and occasioned a miscarriage of justice.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate