NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : JOSEPH MANASSA v JOHN CHESHER & ANOR. [2000] NSWSC 252 CURRENT JURISDICTION: EQUITY FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4542/1996 HEARING DATE(S) : 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24 MARCH 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 April 2000
JOSEPH MANASSA (Plaintiff) PARTIES : JOHN CHESHER (First Defendant) TONY SAHYOUN (Second Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Simos J
G.P. McNally (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : J.E. Armfield (First Defendant) D.H. Murr, SC (Second Defendant) Hunt Musgrave & Peach (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Gulley Helene Scerri (First Defendant) Maurice Marshan (Second Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Contract - Held, the plaintiff failed in his claim to one-third of the proceeds of a winning Lotto ticket alleged by the plaintiff to have been purchased on behalf of an alleged three member syndicate of which the plaintiff was a member. CASES CITED : Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Van Rassel v Kroon (1952-1953) 87 CLR 298 DECISION : PROCEEDINGS DISMISSED
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
SIMOS J
TUESDAY, 11 APRIL 2000
(NO. 4542/96): JOSEPH MANASSA v JOHN CHESHER & ANOR.
JUDGMENT
The Proceedings
Statement of Claim
1 HIS HONOUR: By statement of claim filed 26 February 1998 Joseph Manassa, the plaintiff, claimed against John Chesher, the first defendant, and Tony Sahyoun, the second defendant, that in or about 1982 and 1983 the plaintiff and the first defendant entered into an express oral agreement arising from a conversation between the plaintiff and the first defendant.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate