NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Idoport Pty Ltd & Anor v National Australia Bank Ltd & Ors [7] [2000] NSWSC 599 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50113/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 18 May, 1, 13, 25, 28 June 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 30 June 2000
PARTIES : Idoport Pty Limited & Anor (Plaintiffs) National Australia Bank Limited & Ors (Defendants) JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J
COUNSEL : JJ Garnsey QC, RC Titterton (Plaintiff) RM Smith SC (Defendants) SOLICITORS : Withnell Hetherington (Plaintiffs) Freehil Hollingdate & Page (Defendants) CATCHWORDS : Practice and Procedure - Application to strike out sections of defence to first cross-claim - Second cross-claim - Necessity to gain leave to file second cross-claim - When plaintiff can further plead a cross-claim against a defendant - Matters appropriately pleaded as cross-claim - Matters appropriately included as amendment to statement of claim - Second cross-claim not necessarily inappropriately pleaded. - Practice and Procedure - Limitation periods - Applicability of limitation period to second cross-claim - Approach of Court to submission that leave to file second cross-claim should be refused because it is out of time - Leave not refused on grounds that second cross-claim is out of time. - Practice and Procedure - Pleadings and particulars - Specificity of pleading - Necessary particulars for a claim under s75B of the Trade Practices Act 1974 - Need to plead knowledge of essential matters under s75B - Need to particularise provenance of knowledge with specificity - Where effect of allegation of knowledge comes close to allegation of fraudulent intention particulars of knowledge may often be necessary - Particulars not sufficient. Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) Fair Trading Act 1985 (Vic) LEGISLATION CITED : Limitation Act 1969 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Aurel Forras Pty Ltd v Graham Karp Developments Pty Ltd [1975] VR 202 Bailey v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1977) 136 CLR 214 Baldry v Jackson [1976] 2 NSWLR 415 Burgess v Beethoven Electric Equipment Ltd [1943] 1 KB 96 Chan Cuong SU T/A Ausviet Travel v Direct Flights International Pty Ltd (No 2) (1999) ATPR 41, 677 Dillingham Constructions Pty Ltd v Steel Mains Pty Ltd (1975) 323 Henriksens Rederi A/S v THZ Romilplex (The Brede) [1974] 2 QB 233 CASES CITED : Hornsby Building Information Centre Pty Ltd v Sydney Information Centre (1978) 140 CLR 216 Lyons v Kern Konstructions Pty Ltd (1983) 70 FLR 135 McDonnell & East Ltd v McGregor (1936) 56 CLR 50; R v Associated Northern Collieries (1910) 22 CLR 738 Rajski v Bainton (1990) 22 NSWLR 125 Renton Gibbs Ltd v Neville & Co [1900] 2 QB 181 Vagg v ANZ Banking Group Pty Ltd (1992) 38 NSWLR 160 Wardley v Western Australia (1982) 175 CLR 514 Yorke v Lucas (1985) 158 CLR 661 DECISION : Notice of Motion seeking to strike out sections of amended defence to first cross-claim to be dismissed. Leave granted to file proposed second cross-claim excluding s 75B count.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate