NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Galaxidis v Galaxidis [2001] NSWSC 1123 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3884/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 3, 4, 5, 9 October 2000, 29, 30, 31 January 2001, 1 & 5 February 2001, 1, 2 & 3 May 2001, 3 July 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 6 December 2001
John Galaxidis (P) Athanasios Galaxidis (D1) PARTIES : Georga Galaxidis (D2) Nikolaos Galaxidis (D3) Antonios Galaxidis (D4) JUDGMENT OF : Austin J
COUNSEL : D A Smallbone (P) M J Watts (D1, D2, D4) SOLICITORS : M J Woods & Co (P) Potts Latimer (D1, D2, D4) CATCHWORDS : EQUITY - proprietary estoppel through 'encouraged assumption' - father makes non-contractual promises upon which sons rely to their detriment - ingredients of equitable doctrine - meaning of 'detriment' - appropriate remedies LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) ss 23C, 54A Austotel Pty Ltd v Franklins Selfserve Pty Ltd (1989) 16 NSWLR 582 Australian Woollen Mills Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (1954) 92 CLR 424 Balfour v Balfour [1919] 2 KB 571 Beaton v McDivitt (1987) 13 NSWLR 162 Dillwyn v Llewelyn (1862) 4 De GF & J 517 [45 ER 1285] CASES CITED : Electroboard Administration Pty Ltd v O'Brien [1999] NSWCA 452 Flinn v Flinn [1999] VSCA 109 (Supreme Court of Victoria, Court of Appeal, 4 August 1999) Giumelli v Giumelli (1989) 73 ALJR 547 Ramsden v Dyson (1866) LR 1 HL 129 Riches v Hogben [1985] 2 QdR 292 Roufus v Brewster (1971) 2 SASR 218 The Commonwealth v Verwayen (1990) 170 CLR 394 DECISION : See under heading 'Conclusions'
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate