NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Brachmanis & 1 Ors v Columbus Property Developments P/L & 1 Ors [2001] NSWSC 163 revised - 23/03/2001 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1301/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 8 March 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 8 March 2001
Edgar Brachmanis & Leanne Brachmanis (First Plaintiff) PARTIES : Forbes Holdings (NSW) Pty Ltd (ACN 089 957 577) (Second Plaintiff) Columbus Property Developments Pty Limited (ACN 085 581 193) (First Defendant) Eugene Benson (Second Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Santow J
COUNSEL : L Harris (Sol.) (Plaintiffs) Eugene Benson (In Person) (Defendants) SOLICITORS : M D Nikolaidis & Co (Plaintiffs) CATCHWORDS : CONVEYANCING — Reinstatement of purchasers into possession pending resolution of proceedings for specific performance — Notice to complete requires no breach of condition by party giving it — Defects requiring rectification — Waiver of notice to complete? LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act s135 CASES CITED : McNally v Waitzer [1981] 1 NSWLR 294 DECISION : Plaintiffs entitled to have possession reinstated.
REVISED — 23 March, 2001 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES IN EQUITY
SANTOW J
No. 1301/01 Edgar Brachmanis & Leanne Brachmanis First Plaintiff Forbes Holdings (NSW) Pty Ltd (ACN 089 957 577) Second Plaintiff Columbus Property Developments Pty Limited (ACN 085 581 193) First Defendant Eugene Benson Second Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate