NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Charlton v Upjohn Company & Ors, Elliott v Upjohn Company & Ors, Hesse v Upjohn Company & Ors, Jacobsen v The Upjohn Company & Ors [2000] NSWSC 1090 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20605/95, 12590/93,12596/93; 12602/93 HEARING DATE(S) : 8 December 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 6 October 2000
PLAINTIFFS - Jennifer Denise CHARLTON Haidee Mary ELLIOTT Peter Colin HESSE PARTIES : Paul JACOBSEN DEFENDANTS - UPJOHN COMPANY & ORS
JUDGMENT OF : Simpson J
COUNSEL : Written submissions PLAINTIFFS Maurice Blackburn Cashman DEFENDANTS Phillips Fox SOLICITORS : Blake Dawson Waldron Clayton Utz Tress Cocks & Maddox Ebsworth & Ebsworth Crown Solicitor Office of Western Australia Gray & Perkins CATCHWORDS : Submissions on costs following dismissal of applications for removal to the Court of Appeal and transfer of proceedings under Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross Vesting) Act 1987. LEGISLATION CITED : Trade Practices Act 1974 Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross Vesting) Act 1987 DECISION : Defendant/applicants to pay the plaintiffs' costs of the transfer and removal applications.
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
SIMPSON J
6 October 2000
20605/95 Jennifer Denise CHARLTON v UPJOHN COMPANY & Ors 12590/93 Haidee Mary ELLIOTT v UPJOHN COMPANY & Ors 12596/93 Peter Colin HESSE v UPJOHN COMPANY & Ors 12602/93 Paul JACOBSEN v THE UPJOHN COMPANY & Ors Judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate