NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina (Commonwealth) v Hung [2001] NSWCCA 233 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60557/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 14 June 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 29 June 2001
PARTIES : Crown - Respondent Joseph Tung Kam Hung - Appellant JUDGMENT OF : Simpson J at 1; Badgery-Parker AJ at 24; Newman AJ at 25
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 99/11/3006 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Job DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : J A Coombs - Applicant R F Sutherland - Crown Respondent SOLICITORS : R Storie - Applicant Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions - Respondent CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - sentence and procedure - appeal - whether manifestly excessive - parity - admission of fresh evidence. Financial Transaction Reports Act 1988 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1914 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 R v Lowe (1984) 154 CLR 606 R v Postiglione (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Goodwin (1990) 51 A Crim R 328 R v Munday (1981) 2 NSWLR 177 CASES CITED: R v Gallagher, NSWCCA, 27 August 1991, unreported R v Cartwright (1989) 17 NSWLR 243 R v Scullion, NSWCCA, 15 July 1992, unreported R v Willard [2001] NSWCCA 6, unreported 2 February 2001 R v Abbott [1985) 17 A Crim R 355 R v Munday (1981) 2 NSWLR 177 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60557/99
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate