NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v WJT [2001] NSWCCA 405 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60024/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 1/5/2001 4/5/2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 8 October 2001
PARTIES : Regina WJT JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Sully J at 2; Dowd J at 65
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 97/11/0933 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Morgan DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mr W Washington- Appellant Mr GE Smith- Crown SOLICITORS : Mr M Rumore- Appellant Mr SE O'Connor- Crown CATCHWORDS : Appeal against conviction - Buggery - Sexual intercourse with child between 10 years and 16 years - Whether trial judge erred in not staying indictment - Whether delay, uncertainty and vagueness in the allegations of the complainant - Admissibility of complaint evidence - Directions to jury - Relationship evidence - Section 409B Crimes Act - Whether trial judge erred in not discharging jury after inadmissible evidence led on the basis that the jury would not have heard it - Whether evidence of complainant's and mother's financial circumstances should have been allowed - Whether verdict unsafe and unsatisfactory LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 Evidence Act 1995 Barton v The Queen (1980) 147 CLR 75. Jago v The District Court of New South Wales & Ors (1989) 168 CLR 23. M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487. CASES CITED: R v AH (1997) 98 A Crim R 71. R v BD (1997) 94 A Crim R 131. R v MM (2000) 112 A Crim R 519. R v McGarvey (1987) 10 NSWLR 632. Re Cooney (1987) 31 A Crim R 256. DECISION : Appeal dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate