NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : REGINA v TADMAN [2001] NSWCCA 225 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60208/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 29/05/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 29 May 2001
PARTIES : Regina Jaydon Tadman JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Hulme J at 39; Howie J at 44
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 99/21/0025 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Mahoney DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : T A Game SC (Appellant) G E Smith (Respondent) SOLICITORS : D J Humphreys (Appellant) S E O'Connor (Respondent) CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - dangerous driving occasioning death - whether sentence manifestly excessive - where strong subjective features redounding to appellant's credit - whether incorrect application of sentencing principles - R v Jurisic (1998) 45 NSWLR 209 LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 Justices Act 1902 Ibbs v The Queen (1987) 163 CLR 447 CASES CITED: R v Comber (NSWCCA, 11 November 1998, unreported) R v Jurisic (1998) 45 NSWLR 209 R v Thomson (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 DECISION : 1 Leave to appeal against sentence granted; 2 Appeal allowed; 3 Sentence of the District Court of 21 April 1999 quashed; 4 Appellant sentenced to five years and three months imprisonment commencing on 12 April 1999, expiring on 11 July 2004 with a non-parole period of two years and eight months commencing on 12 April 1999 and expiring on 11 December 2001.
- 11 - IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
60208/99 SPIGELMAN CJ HULME J HOWIE J
Tuesday 29 May 2001
REGINA v Jaydon TADMAN
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate