NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Harding v Winkler; Harding v MacDonald & Anor [2000] NSWSC 737 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20567 of 1999; 20037 of 1999 HEARING DATE(S) : 4 July 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 28 July 2000
Kathleen Harding (Plaintiff) v Nicholas Gary Winkler (formerly trading as Nicholas Winkler & Turner) (Defendant) PARTIES : Kathleen Harding (Plaintiff) v Ian Harding Donald MacDonald & Peter Fairfield (formerly trading as MacDonald & Fairfield) (Defendants)
JUDGMENT OF : Master Malpass
Mr K Ryan (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr M Jones (Defendant 20567 of 1999) Mr D R Pritchard (Defendants 20037 of 1999) Peter Chamberlain & Co (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Corrs Chambers Westgarth (Defendant 20567 of 1999) Henry Davis York (Defendants 20037 of 1999) CATCHWORDS : Summary disposition of proceedings - expiry of relevant limitation periods - claim of negligence against solicitors - when damage first occurs - did the alleged wrongful conduct effectively preclude the institution of proceedings. LEGISLATION CITED : N/A Cartledge v E Jopling and Sons Limited (1963) AC 758. CASES CITED : Hawkins v Clayton (1988) 164 CLR 539. Sampson v Zucker (Court of Appeal, 11 December (1996). Wardley Australia limited & Anor v The State of Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514. DECISION : See paragraph 30.
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate