NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Wykanak v OCA [2000] NSWSC 164 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3884 of 1999 HEARING DATE(S) : 8 March 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 8 March 2000
Dominic Wykanak (Plaintiff) Olympic Co-Ordination Authority (First Defendant) PARTIES : Andrew Refshauge - Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning (Second Defendant) Susan Holliday - Director General of Urban Affairs and Planning (Third Defendant) S A Smits & Associates (Fourth Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Windeyer J at 1
in person (Plaintiff) Mr P.M. Wood (First Defendant) COUNSEL : no appearance (Second Defendant) Mr A Galasso (Third Defendant) Mr M Scott (Fourth Defendant) in person (Plaintiff) Clayton Utz (First Defendant) SOLICITORS : Christine Hanson (Second Defendant) Christine Hanson (Third Defendant) Sparke Helmore (Fourth Defendant) CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - dismissal of proceedings - plaintiff's non-compliance with directions - failure to provide particulars of allegations of misleading and deceptive conduct as directed by the court - plaintiff has no pesonal interest and no possible right to damages - proceedings dismissed - Pt 33 r6 SCR LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules Pt33 r6 DECISION : See paragraph 14
3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
WINDEYER J
WEDNESDAY 8 MARCH 2000
3884/99 DOMINIC WYKANAK v OLYMPIC CO-ORDINATION AUTHORITY & ORS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate