NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Global Custodians Ltd v Mesh [2000] NSWSC 845 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2539/98; 3156/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 04/08/2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 28 August 2000
Global Custodians Limited (P) PARTIES : Pamela Ann Mesh and Helen Chuproff (D1 & 2) Hari Bhagat (D3) JUDGMENT OF : Young J
G C Lindsay SC and R F Margo (P) COUNSEL : L Robinson (D1 & 2) Third defendant in person SOLICITORS : Holding Redlich (P) Third defendant in person CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE [683]- Contempt- Intimidating prospective plaintiff- Whether contempt- Element of intention- How satisfied. LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995, s 131 Supreme Court Act 1970, s 84 Attorney General v Times Newspapers Ltd [1974] AC 273 Re B [1965] Ch 1112 Bentley v Nelson [1963] WAR 89 Clyne v NSW Bar Association (1960) 104 CLR 186 Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Preston [1981] 2 NSWLR 554 CASES CITED : Commonwealth Trading Bank v Inglis (1974) 131 CLR 311 In re Daintrey; Ex parte Holt [1893] 2 QB 116 Ebert v Venvil [1999] 3 WLR 670 Gregory v Philip Morris Ltd (1987) 74 ALR 300 Re Mulock (1864) 3 Sw & Tr 599; 164 ER 1407 Smith v Lakeman (1856) 26 LJ Ch 305 Willshire-Smith v Votino Bros Pty Ltd (1993) 41 FCR 496 DECISION : See para 40
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION YOUNG J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate