New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [2000] NSWSC 375 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20223 of 1995; 20592 of 1996 HEARING DATE(S) : 5 May 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 May 2000 JOHN MARSDEN (Plaintiff) PARTIES : v AMALGAMATED TELEVISION SERVICES PTY LIMITED (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Levine J at 1 I Barker Q.C. M R Hall (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : W H Nicholas Q.C. J S Wheelhouse (Defendant) Phillips Fox (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Mallesons Stephen Jaques (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Defendant's subpoena - Police Service - access - T5791 DECISION : See paragraph 1 DLJT: 140 (Ex Tempore - Revised) [2000] NSWSC 375 THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION DEFAMATION LIST No. 20223 of 1995 No. 20592 of 1996 JUSTICE DAVID LEVINE FRIDAY 5 MAY 2000 JOHN MARSDEN (Plaintiff) v AMALGAMATED TELEVISION SERVICES PTY LIMITED ACN 000 145 246 (Defendant) JUDGMENT (Defendant's subpoena - Police Service - access- T5791) 1 In answer to the subpoena issued by the defendant's solicitors, the New South Wales Police Service has produced a parcel of documents in response to the subpoena issued on 1 May relating to Detective Panich and another. The materials are contained in packet number 391. I have examined the schedule to the subpoena and skimmed through the documents attached. There is nothing in there that persuades me that the plaintiff should have first access. The defendant will have first access, and the plaintiff thereafter. *********** Last Modified: 09/25/2000 DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.