NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Giri (No 2) [2001] NSWCCA 234 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60830/99 HEARING DATE(S) : Written submissions filed 20/06/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 June 2001
PARTIES : Regina v Nitin Giri JUDGMENT OF : Heydon JA at 1; Barr J at 23; Smart AJ at 24
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 70061/98 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Studdert J OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Crown: Mr G E Smith Appellant: Mr P Byrne SC/Ms G Bashir SOLICITORS : Crown: S E O'Connor Appellant: Ross Hill and Associates CATCHWORDS : Criminal Practice and Procedure - Natural Justice and Procedural Fairness - Whether natural justice denied - Whether case should be reopened and further submissions considered - Where appellant's solicitors but not counsel were given advance notice of the time of judgment delivery - Where appellant not specifically informed that court would consider application of proviso under Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6. - D LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300 Azzopardi v R [2001] HCA 25 R v Bozzola [2001] NSWCCA 8 R v Frawley (1993) 69 A Crim R 208 CASES CITED: Glennon v R (1994) 119 ALR 706 Quartermaine v R (1980) 143 CLR 595 State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd (1982) 150 CLR 29 Wentworth v Woollahra Municipal Council (1982) 149 CLR 672 R v Whittaker (1993) 68 A Crim R 476 Wilde v R (1988) 164 CLR 365 DECISION : The Court notes that the order made on 12 June 2001 is not to be changed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate