NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Chetcuti v Scarf & Ors [2000] NSWSC 637 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2024/2000 HEARING DATE(S) : 16/06/2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 19 June 2000
Joseph Chetcuti (P) PARTIES : Stephanie Beryl Scarf (D1) Kentspin Pty Limited (D2) Michael Paul Charles Williams (D3) JUDGMENT OF : Young J
R C McDougall QC and A G Todd (P) COUNSEL : M T McCulloch (D1) P Kerr (Solicitor) (D2 & 3) Carbone Anderson (P) SOLICITORS : Turtons (D1) Allen Allen & Hemsley (D2 & 3) CATCHWORDS : CONVEYANCING [184]- Caveat- Claim for rescission of surrender of lease- Not an interest in land to support caveat - LANDLORD & TENANT [99]- Retail lease- Effect of extension to five years under s 16(2) of Retail Leases Act runs foul of Real Property Act, s 53. Real Property Act 1900, s 42(d), 53, 74K LEGISLATION CITED : Retail Leases Act 1994, s 16(2) Supreme Court Act 1970 Trade Practices Act 1995, s 87 Chang v Registrar of Titles (1976) 137 CLR 177 Clough v The London & Northwestern Railway Company (1871) LR 7 Ex 26 CASES CITED : Kramer v McMahon (1969) 89 WN (Pt 1) (NSW) 584 Re Pile's Caveats [1981] Qd R 81 Solle v Butcher [1950] 2 KB 671 Zorbas v McNamara (1961) 62 SR (NSW) 159 DECISION : Notice of motion dismissed with costs.
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION YOUNG J MONDAY 19 JUNE 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate