NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Kioussis & Anor v M D Nikolaidis & Co & Anor [2001] NSWSC 353 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 10532 of 2001 HEARING DATE(S) : 30 April 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 4 May 2001
Angela Kioussis, Migolin Pty Ltd (Plaintiffs) PARTIES : v M D Nikolaidis & Co, Leon Nikolaidis (Defendants) JUDGMENT OF : Master Malpass
LOWER COURT Costs Assessment JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 90467 of 2000 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Neville E Menlove JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : N/A (Plaintiffs) Mr J A Trebeck (Defendants) SOLICITORS : In person (and as a Director of Migolin Pty Ltd) M D Nikolaidis & Co (Defendants) CATCHWORDS : Legislative scheme for challenge to decision or determination made by Costs Assessor - distinction between decision and determination - jurisdiction of the Court under s 208L - the operation of s 208A (2) - review the appropriate avenue of challenge to determination. Legal Profession Act 1987, s 207, s 208A, s 208A (2), s 208D,s 208E, s 208F, s 208J, LEGISLATION CITED : s 208JAA, s 208JB, Subdivision 4A, s 208KA, s 208KB, Subdivision 4B, s 208L, s 208L (2), s 208M. Firth v Kasumovic [2001] NSWSC 341. CASES CITED : Chilcotin Pty Ltd & Anor v Cenelage Pty Ltd & Ors [1999] NSWCA 11. O'Connor v Fitti [2000] NSWSC 540. Turner v Pride [1999] NSWSC 850. DECISION : See Paragraph 28.
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate