NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Campbell v The Public Trustee [2000] NSWSC 936 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1182/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 24 August 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 6 October 2000
PARTIES : Isobel Ruth Campbell (Plaintiff) The Public Trustee (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Master McLaughlin at 41
COUNSEL : Yvonne Holt (Plaintiff) John R. Wilson (Defendant) SOLICITORS : Thomas Laycock, Solicitors (Plaintiff) P J Whitehead, Solicitor for the Public Trustee (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Family Provision - Intestacy - Small estate - Plaintiff was formerly the de facto spouse of Deceased - Whether Plaintiff was his de facto spouse at the time of death of Deceased - Plaintiff, in any event, is an eligible person within paragraph (d) of definition - Factors warranting the making of the application - Competing claims of persons entitled on intestacy (being the eight children of Deceased) Family Provision Act 1982 LEGISLATION CITED : Wills, Probate and Administration Act 1898 De Facto Relationships Act 1984 CASES CITED : Roy v Sturgeon (1986) 11 NSWLR 454 DECISION : See paragraph 41
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
MASTER McLAUGHLIN
Friday, 6 October 2000
1182/99 ISOBEL RUTH CAMPBELL -V- THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE JUDGMENT
1. MASTER: These are proceedings under the Family Provision Act 1982.
2. By summons filed on 25 January 1999 the Plaintiff, Isobel Ruth Campbell, claims an order for provision for her maintenance, education and advancement in life out of the estate of the late Kevin Morgan (to whom I shall refer as "the Deceased").
3. The Deceased died, aged 57, on 25 July 1997. He died intestate. Letters of administration of his intestate estate were on 14 October 1998 granted to the Public Trustee (who is the Defendant to the present proceedings).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate