NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : National Australia Bank Ltd v Voloshin [2000] NSWSC 84 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 11227/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 16 February 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 February 2000
National Australia Bank Limited (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Roman Voloshin (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison
Mr Steven Reeves (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr Michael Zammit (Defendant) Miss Frazis & Miss Johnson Mallesons Stephen Jaques (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Mr Peter Woods Peter Woods & Associates (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Summary judgment - cross claim - SCR Supreme Court Rules LEGISLATION CITED : Trade Practices Act Fair Trading Act Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act Air Services Australia v Zarb (NSWSC unreported, 26 August 1998) Dey v Victoria Railway Commissioners (1948-49) 78 CLR 62 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (1964) 112 CLR 125 CASES CITED : Webster & Anor v Lampard (1993) 177 CLR 598 Gould & Anor v Vaggelas & Ors (1984-85) 157 CLR 215 Scott v Beneficial Corp (1996) 18 ATPR 53,301 Morwood & AnorChaemdata Pty Limited (1995) ATPR 40,827 Kerr on the Law of Fraud and Mistakes 7th ed (1952) DECISION : See para 22
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate