NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : SOUTH WESTERN SYDNEY AREA HEALTH SERVICE V. GABRIEL & ANOR., GATENBY V. GABRIEL & ANOR. [2001] NSWCA 477 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40434/01, 40436/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 18 October 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 17 December 2001
South Western Sydney Area Health Service - Appellant/2nd Opponent PARTIES : Leisel Gabriel - 1st Respondent/1st Opponent Andrew Gatenby - 2nd Respondent/Claimant JUDGMENT OF : Beazley JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 2; Rolfe AJA at 47
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT 10080/00 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Williams DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Ms. K. Burke for appellant Mr. G. Craddock for respondents Ebsworth & Ebsworth, Sydney for Appellant SOLICITORS : Charlton Sherman for 1st respondent Tress Cocks & Maddox for 2nd respondent CATCHWORDS : LIMITATION OF ACTIONS - Extension of time - Whether "just and reasonable" - Onus of proof - Applicant must prove there would not be such prejudice as would make the chances of an acceptably fair trial unlikely. D. LEGISLATION CITED : Limitation Act 1969 ss.60G and 60I Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v. Taylor (1996) 186 CLR 541 Salido v. Nominal Defendant (1993) 32 NSWLR 524 CASES CITED: Jones v. Royal Hospital for Women [1998] NSWCA 384 Holt v. Wynter (2000) 49 NSWLR 128 BHP Steel (AIS) Pty. Ltd. v. Lakovski [2000] NSWCA 334 at [9] McLean v. Sydney Water Corporation [2001] NSWCA 122. DECISION : See par.46 of judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate