NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : BORAL TRANSPORT LTD v WHITEHEAD & ORS [2001] NSWCA 395 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 41060/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 22 October 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 13 November 2001
Boral Transport Limited - Appellant PARTIES : Terry John Whitehead - First Respondent Muswellbrook Coal Co Limited - Second Respondent AMP General Insurance Limited - Third Respondent JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1; Stein JA at 69; Heydon JA at 70
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT 791/98 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Sidis DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
J E Maconachie QC/H J Halligan - Appellant COUNSEL : J E Sexton SC/R J Cheney - First Respondent I G Harrison SC/R H Weinstein - Second Respondent N/A - Third Respondent Abbott Tout - Appellant SOLICITORS : Bale Boshev & Associates - First Respondent McCabe Terrill - Second Respondent Sparke Helmore - Third Respondent CATCHWORDS : TORT - Negligence - breach - causation - damages - truck driver injured when truck turned over while transporting coal - standard of duty owed by employer. LEGISLATION CITED : Workers Compensation Act 1987 Motor Traffic Act 1909 Bankstown Foundry Pty Limited v Braistina (1986) 160 CLR 301 Betts v Whittingslowe (1945) 71 CLR 637 Electric Power Transmission Pty Limited v Cuiuli (1961) 104 CLR 177 Hamilton v Nu Roof (WA) Pty Ltd (1956) 96 CLR 18 CASES CITED: Liftronic Pty Limited v Unver (2001) 75 ALJR 867 O'Connor v Commissioner for Government Transport (1954) 100 CLR 225 Oxley County Council v MacDonald & Ors (unreported) [1999] NSWCA 126 Podrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Limited (1985) 59 ALJR 492 Smith v Austin Lifts Ltd [1959] 1 WLR 100 Smith v The Broken Hill Proprietary Company Limited (1957) 97 CLR 337 DECISION : 1. Appellant's appeal dismissed with costs to be assessed on an indemnity basis; 2. Second respondent's cross-appeal dismissed with costs; 3. First respondent's cross-appeal allowed; 4. The verdict, judgment and orders of 14 December 2000 set aside other than the order for costs; 5. In lieu thereof ; (a) verdict and judgment for the plaintiff against the first defendant for $587,511.28; (b) verdict and judgment for the plaintiff against the second defendant for $556,264.99; (c) verdict and judgment for the first defendant on its cross-claim against the second defendant for $389,385.89; (d) verdict and judgment for the second defendant on its cross-claim against the first defendant for $198,125.79; 6. No order as to the costs of the first respondent's cross-appeal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate