NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2001) 36 ACSR 758 (2001) 19 ACLC 529
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Arthur Yates & Co Limited (Application of) [2001] NSWSC 40 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1173/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 06/02/01, 07/02/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 February 2001
PARTIES : In the matter of Arthur Yates & Co Limited (ACN 000 004 688) Arthur Yates & Co Limited (ACN 000 004 688) (Applicant)) JUDGMENT OF : Santow J
COUNSEL : M B Oakes, SC (Applicant) SOLICITORS : Coudert Brothers (Applicant) CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS — Scheme of arrangement effecting a merger — Exclusivity period during which it is sought that no other proposal be canvassed — Legality of such constraint — Need to qualify by reference to directors' duties and lawfulness — Other requirements for acceptability — Comparison of UK under Panel rules. LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Law s411 DECISION : Orders made approving convening of meeting of shareholders to consider proposed scheme of arrangement.
REVISED — 7 February, 2001 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES IN EQUITY
SANTOW J
No. 1173/01 In the matter of ARTHUR YATES & CO LIMITED (ACN 000 004 688) ARTHUR YATES & CO LIMITED (ACN 000 004 688) Applicant
JUDGMENT — ex tempore 7 February 2001 1 What follows are some brief observations relating to a shareholders' scheme of arrangement which introduces the still novel concept of an exclusivity period during which alternative merger arrangements and their solicitation are constrained. 2 The relevant clause in the Implementation Agreement following helpful discussion between Counsel and the Court, is in the following terms: "Exclusivity
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate