NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Keith Brown [2001] NSWCCA 367 revised - 21/09/2001 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60651/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 12 September 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 September 2001
PARTIES : Regina Keith Brown JUDGMENT OF : Sully J at 1; Carruthers AJ at 20
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 00/31/0149 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL English DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : D. Woodburne - Crown R. Burgess - Appellant SOLICITORS : S. E. O'Connor - Crown Legal Aid Commission of NSW - Appellant
CASES CITED: R v Deeble (unreported) CCA 19/9/91 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted; appeal upheld; sentences imposed in Court below quashed - in lieu: on count 1 a sentence of imprisonment for 4 years commencing on a day 7 weeks prior to 1st September 2000. Non parole period of 2 years to commence on that same day.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
60651/00
SULLY J CARRUTHERS AJ
Wednesday 12 September 2001 Regina v Keith Brown JUDGMENT
1 SULLY J: The Court is in a position to deal with this matter.
2 The present applicant, Mr Brown, seeks leave to appeal against the asserted severity of sentences passed upon him by her Honour Judge English sitting in the District Court at Newcastle on 29 September 2000.
3 Mr Brown had pleaded guilty before her Honour to two counts, each of which charged him with the supply of a prohibited drug, namely, methylamphetamine. The supply was a deemed supply; and each of the two offences thus charged exposed Mr Brown upon conviction to a statutory maximum penalty of, relevantly, imprisonment for 15 years.
4 Mr Brown asked her Honour to take into account, - and her Honour did take into account, - two further matters that were placed before her Honour upon a Form 1.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate