NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2003) NSWConvR 56-037
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Parras & Ors v FAI General Insurance Company Ltd (Prov Liq apptd) [2001] NSWSC 1077 revised - 30/11/2001 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2775/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 05/07/01, 06/07/01, 10/07/01, 23/07/01, 02/08/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 23 November 2001
Michael Alfred Parras and Daphne Maria Parras (First Plaintiffs) PARTIES : Constantine Nicholas Savas and Elizabeth Savas (Second Plaintiffs) FAI General Insurance Company Ltd (Provisional Liquidator appointed) (ACN 000 327 855) (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Santow J
COUNSEL : A W Street, SC/ S Kaur-Bains (Plaintiffs) B A J Coles, QC/ R G McHugh (Defendant) SOLICITORS : A C Comino & Associates (Plaintiffs) Abbott Tout (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : PROPERTY - Lease - Option to exercise - Notice - Was option validly exercised in accordance with its terms - Section 170 of Conveyancing Act 1900 with respect to service of notice - Section 76-7 of the Interpretation Act (NSW) 1987 - posting notice to a company - Construction of lease. LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) s170 Alexander v Stocks and Holdings Limited [1975] VR 843 Bressan v Squires [1974] 2 NSWLR 460 Burrell v Cameron (SCNSW, Windeyer J, 4 April 1997, unreported) Capper v Thorpe (1998) 194 CLR 342 Carradine Properties Ltd v Aslam [1976] 1 WLR 442 Canon Brewery Co Limited v Signal Press Limited (1928) 139 LT 384 Curtice v London City and Midland Bank Limited [1908] 1 KB 293 Diakogiannis v Johnson (1989) NSWConR 55?472 Eaglehill Limited v J Needham Builders Limited [1973] AC 992 Gilbert J McCaul (Aust) Pty Ltd v Pitt Club Ltd (1959) 59 SR(NSW) 122 Helby v Matthews [1895] AC 471 Hillier v Goodfellow [1988] VicConvR 54?310 Holwell Securities Ltd v Hughes [1974] 1 WLR 155 In Re 88 Berkely Road NW9 [1971] 1 Ch 648 In re McGrath; Ex parte Official Receiver (1890) 24 QBD 466 Integrated Computer Services Pty Limited v Digital Equipment Corp (Aust) Pty Ltd (1988) 5 BPR 97326 CASES CITED : Kodros Shipping Corporation of Monrovia v Empresa Cubana De Fletes (The Evia) (No2) [1983] 1 AC 736 Latec Finance Pty Limited v Knight [1969] 2 NSWR 79 Laybutt v Amoco Australia Pty Limited (1974) 132 CLR 57 Lollypops (Harbourside) Pty Limited v Werncog Pty Limited (1998) 9 BPR 16,361 Mannai Limited v Eagle Star Association Company Ltd [1997] 2 WLR 945 National Mutual Life v Windsor (1991) 28 FCR 214 NM Superannuation Pty Limited v Hughes & Ors (1992) 10 ACLC 477 N V Stoom Maats de Maas v Nippon Yusen Kaisha (The Pendrecht) [1980] 2 Lloyd's Rep 56 Oscar's Town Centre Restaurant Pty Limited v Port Shores Pty Limited (1987) NSWConvR 55?331 Rex v Westminster Unions Assessment Committee [1917] 1 KB 832 Spiro v Glencrown Properties Limited [1991] Ch 537 Tenax Steamship Co Limited v The Brimnes (Owners) [1975] 1 QB 929 Tricontinental Corporation Ltd v HDFI Ltd (1990) 21 NSWLR 689 Tonitto v Bassal (1992) 28 NSWLR 564 Wallville Pty Ltd v Liristis Holdings Pty Limited ([2001] NSWSC 894 Bryson J, 16 October 2001, unreported) Young v Lamb ([2001] NSWCA 225, 13 July 2001, unreported) DECISION : Option validly exercised.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate