NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : IDOPORT PTY LIMITED & ANOR v NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED AND 8 ORS; IDOPORT PTY LTD "JMG" & MARKET HOLDINGS PTY LTD v DONALD ROBERT ARGUS [11] [2000] NSWSC 945 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50113/98; 50026/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 3/10/00, 4/10/00 & 5/10/00 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 October 2000
IDOPORT PTY LIMITED (Plaintiff) PARTIES : MARKET HOLDINGS PTY LTD (Plaintiff) NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED (Defendant) DONALD ROBERT ARGUS (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J
COUNSEL : JJ Garnsey QC, RC Titterton & R Alkadamani (Plaintiffs) TF Bathurst QC, JR Sackar QC, H K Insall (Defendants) SOLICITORS : Withnell Hetherington (Plaintiffs) Freehill Hollingdale and Page (Defendants) CATCHWORDS : Practice and procedure - Avoidance of multiplicity of proceedings - Order that proceedings raising common questions of law and fact and arising out of same set of transactions be heard together - Case management. Amendment 337 to Supreme Court Rules Evidence Act 1995 Judicature Act 1873 (UK) LEGISLATION CITED : Judiciary Act 1903 Supreme Court Act 1873 Supreme Court Act 1970 s63 Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidated) Act 1925 (UK) CASES CITED : Philip Morris Inc v Adam P. Brown Male Fashions (1980) 148 CLR 457 Trawl Industries v Effem Foods (1992) 36 FCR 406 DECISION : The Defendants' Notice of Motion allowed, costs being reserved.
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION - COMMERCIAL LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate