NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Timms v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2001] NSWSC 560 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2644/94; 3054/97 HEARING DATE(S) : 21, 22, 23, 28, 29, 30 March 2001; 5, 12 April 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 6 July 2001
2644/94 Anastasia Timms (P1) Brian Timms (P2) TW Holdings Pty Ltd (P3) BDA International Pty Ltd (P4) Commonwealth Bank of Australia (D1) Richard Robert Wheeler and Virginia Lee Wheeler (D2) Leslie Ludovic Rosenfeld and Alfred PARTIES : Kant t/as Rosenfeld, Kant & Co (D3) William Watson, Joseph Patrick McNamara, Roderick James Watt and Bruce Davies Atkinson t/as Watson McNamara & Watt (D4) 3054/97 Commonwealth Bank of Australia (P) Anastasia Timms (D1) Brian Timms (D2) TW Holdings Pty Ltd (D3) BDA International Pty Ltd (D4) JUDGMENT OF : Young CJ in Eq
M L D Einfeld QC and T G R Parker (Ps) COUNSEL : R G Forster SC and N L Manousaridis (Bank) R E Dubler (Accountant) Boskovitz & Associates (Ps) SOLICITORS : L E Taylor (Bank) Phillips Fox (Accountant) CATCHWORDS : TORTS [35] & [42]- Negligence- Banks- Accountant- Whether Bank assumed a duty to pass on information- Whether Accountant failed to carry out his retainer- On facts claim fails. DECISION : See paras 110, 120, 121, 122, 123 and 124
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate