NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2001) 119 A Crim R 519
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Giovannone [2001] NSWCCA 22 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60728/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 6 February 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 22 February 2001
PARTIES : Philip Giovannone - Applicant Crown - Respondent JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1; Grove J at 44; Kirby J at 45
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 98/11/0863 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Flannery DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : R A Bonnici - Applicant P Hock - Crown SOLICITORS : S Moran & Co - Applicant S E O'Connor - Crown CATCHWORDS : Criminal law and procedure - appeals against interlocutory rulings - When court will interfere with discretion of prosecutor as to continuation and conduct of proceedings - When court will grant a stay of proceedings - Criminal Appeal Act 1912, s5F LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) BWM (1997) 91 A CrimR 260 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 R v Tolmie (unreported) NSWCCA, 7 December 1994 Maxwell v The Queen (1996) 184 CLR 501 Barton v The Queen (1980) 147 CLR 75 CASES CITED: R v Brown (1989) 17 NSWLR 472 R v Van Phu Ho (unreported) NSWCCA 18 July 1994 R v Pirrottina (unreported) NSWCCA 27 September 1996 Jago v District Court (1989) 168 CLR 23 Butera v DPP for the State of Victoria (1987) 164 CLR 180 R v Menzies [1982] 1 NZLR 40 DPP v Hardas (unreported) District Court 2 September 1999 DECISION : 1. Leave granted on both applications; 2. Appeals dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate