NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 123 A Crim R 14
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Richards [2001] NSWCCA 160 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60749/99 HEARING DATE(S) : Thursday 29 March 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 1 May 2001
PARTIES : Regina v Warren Austin Richards JUDGMENT OF : Powell JA at 71; Grove J at 1; Simpson J at 72
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 95/11/0542 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Flannery DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : L. Fullerton SC (Crown/Respondent) P. Byrne SC with G. Bashir (Appellant) SOLICITORS : D.P.P. (Commonwealth) Grahame W. Howe & Co (Appellant) CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE - CONSPIRACY TO IMPORT NARCOTIC - ALLEGED ENTRAPMENT - COUNSELLING BY POLICE AGENT TO COMMIT OFFENCE IN A CHAIN LEADING TO THE APPELLANT - EVIDENCE - CROSS EXAMINATION CONCERNING TREATMENT OF CO-OFFENDER - SPECIAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR JURY SECURITY - PLEA OF GUILTY BY CO-OFFENDER IN PRESENCE OF JURY - SENTENCE - DISCOUNT FOR POSSIBLE ENTRAPMENT RECEIVED BY CO-OFFENDER - DISPARITY BETWEEN SENTENCES REQUIRING ADJUSTMENT LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act (Commonwealth) 1914 Evidence Act 1995 Bunning v Cross 1978 141 CLR 54 Lowe v The Queen 1984 154 CLR 606 Mooney v James 1949 VLR 22 Postiglione v The Queen 1997 189 CLR 295 R v Bijkerk 2000 111 A Crim R 443 R v Birtles 1969 Cr App R 469 R v Mandica 1980 24 SASR 394 CASES CITED: R v Richards & Bijkerk 1999 107 A Crim R 318 R v Sloane (No 2) unrep CCA (NSW) 15 July 1992 R v Sloane 1990 49 A Crim R 270 R v Stokes unrep CCA (NSW) 16 June 1988 R v Taouk 1992 65 A Crim R 387 R v Wong 1999 48 NSWLR 40 Ridgeway v The Queen 1995 184 CLR 19 Sherman v United States 356 US 369 (1958) The Queen v Olbrich 1999 199 CLR 270 DECISION : Appeal against conviction dismissed; Appeal against sentence allowed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate