NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Spathis; R v Patsalis [2001] NSWCCA 476 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60093/00; 60139/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 30/07/01, 31/07/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 29 November 2001
PARTIES : Regina v Alexios Spathis; Regina v Michael Patsalis JUDGMENT OF : Heydon JA at 1; Carruthers AJ at 201; Smart AJ at 446
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 70200/97; 70002/97 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Kirby J OFFICER :
Crown: Mr G E Smith COUNSEL : Spathis: Mr A J Bellanto QC/Mr P Lowe Patsalis: In person SOLICITORS : Crown: S E O'Connor Spathis: Patricia White & Associates CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law - Murder - Appeal - Conviction - Conduct of legal practitioners - Incompetent representation - Whether legal representatives at trial were incompetent - Whether counsel should have led further character evidence - Whether counsel should have applied for separate trials of co-accused - Whether incompetence caused prejudice to appellant creating miscarriage of justice - Criminal Law - Murder - Appeal - Application to adduce further evidence on appeal - Whether "fresh evidence" - Whether further evidence likely to lead to new trial - Whether further evidence raised possibility of miscarriage of justice - Criminal Law - Murder - Appeal - Judicial directions to jury - Whether misdirections - Whether direction necessary that jury members must all be satisfied on at least one basis of liability - Where one indictment count of murder but alternate bases of liability at trial including felony murder and mens rea murder - Whether manslaughter verdict ought to have been left open to jury - Directions re elements of felony murder - Directions re use of relationship evidence - Directions re lies of accused and consciousness of guilt - Directions re evidence from deceased witness - Criminal Law - Murder - Appeal - Evidence - Whether trial judge erred in permitting Crown to cross-examine a witness as unfavourable - Evidence Act 1995, s 38(1)(c) - Whether trial judge erred in failing to exclude evidence of lies as "admissions" - Crimes Act 1990 (NSW), s 424A. - Criminal Law - Murder - Appeal - Joint-trial - Whether trial judge ought to have ordered separate trial of co-accused - Criminal Law - Murder - Appeal - Sentence - Whether sentence excessive - Whether lack of parity between sentences imposed upon co-offenders - Whether proper consideration by sentencing judge of assistance given to police by appellant - D Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) Prevention of Fraud (Investments) Act 1958 Adam v The Queen [2001] HCA 57 Barlow v The Queen (1997) 188 CLR 1 R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 R v Boreman and Ors [2000] 1 All ER 307 R v Bowden (1981) 7 A Crim R 378 R v Kevin Brown (1983) 79 Cr App R 115 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Bullard v The Queen [1975] AC 635 R v Burke [1983] 2 NSWLR 93 R v Carberry [1994] Crim LR 446 R v Connelly [1991] 2 Qd R 171 R v Crabbe (1985) 156 CLR 464 R v Cramp (1999) 110 A Crim R 198 R v Drummond and Domican (No 2) (1990) 46 A Crim R 408 R v Clarke; Ex parte Attorney-General of Queensland [1999] QCA 438 Edwards v The Queen (1993) 178 CLR 193 R v Foley (1998) 105 A Crim R 1 Gallagher v R (1986) 160 CLR 392 R v Giannetto [1997] 1 Cr App R 1 Gilbert v The Queen (2000) 74 ALJR 676 Gipp v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 106 R v GH (2000) 105 FCR 419 R v Hamilton (1983) 68 A Crim R 298 Harriman v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 590 R v Hauser (1982) 6 A Crim R 68 Henriques v The Queen [1991] 1 WLR 242 R v Henry (1992) 28 NSWLR 348 CASES CITED: R v Hitchins [1983] 3 NSWLR 318 R v Horton (1998) 45 NSWLR 426 R v Hunter and Sharah [1999] NSWCCA 5 R v Johns [1978] 1 NSWLR 282 Leivers & Ballinger (1998) 101 A Crim R 175 R v Mansour (unreported, NSWSC, 19 November 1996) R v Mendham & Foster (1993) 71 A Crim R 382 Mickelberg v R (1989) 167 CLR 259 Moss v Brown [1979] 1 NSWLR 114 R v Munro (1981) 4 A Crim R 67 Osland v The Queen (1998) 197 CLR 333 Palmer v R (1998) 193 CLR 1 Pemble v The Queen (1971) 124 CLR 107 R v Phan [2001] NSWCCA 29 Ratten v R (1974) 131 CLR 510 R v Reed [1999] NSWCCA 258 R v Rees [2001] NSWCCA 23 Ryan v The Queen (1966-1967) 121 CLR 205 R v Ajiit Sing Sat-Bhambra (1989) 88 Cr App R 55 R v Schneidas [1981] 2 NSWLR 713 R v Serratore (1999) 48 NSWLR 101 R v Sharah (1992) 30 NSWLR 292 R v Stewart and Schofield [1995] 1 Cr App R 441 R v Taouk (unreported, NSWCCA, 17 December 1992) R v Thatcher (1987) 39 DLR (4th) 275 R v Williamson [2000] 1 VR 58 Wilson v The Queen (1970) 123 CLR 334 Wilson v The Queen (1992) 174 CLR 313 R v Zaidi (1991) 57 A Crim R 189 DECISION : See paras 199 and 200
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate