NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Carriage v Duke Australia Operations Pty Ltd [2000] NSWSC 239 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1546/2000 HEARING DATE(S) : 10/03/2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 March 2000
PARTIES : Allan Richard Carriage and Nancy Lena Campbell (P) Duke Australia Operations Pty Ltd (D) JUDGMENT OF : Young J
COUNSEL : A Shand QC and S B Phillips (P) J Sheahan SC (D) SOLICITORS : Andrew Chalk Associates (P) Minter Ellison (D) CATCHWORDS : Aboriginals [3]- Land rights- Members of community seeking to enforce Native Title Consent Agreement- Equitable relief sought. Equity [343]- Injunctions- Undertaking as to damages- Plaintiffs suing for others beside themselves- Those others not prepared to support by undertaking as to damages- Relevant factor in considering whether order made. Words & Phrases- "Land Disturbance". LEGISLATION CITED : Native Title Act 1993 Corkill v Forestry Commission of NSW (No 2) (1991) 73 LGRA 126 De Mattos v Gibson (1859) 4 De G & J 276 Fitzgerald v Firbanks [1897] 2 Ch 103 Greene v West Cheshire Railway Co (1871) LR 13 Eq 44 MacMillon Bloedel Ltd v Mullin (1985) 61 BCLR 145 CASES CITED : MA Productions Pty Ltd v Austarama Television Pty Ltd (1982) 7 ACLR 97 Micklethwait v Winter (1851) 6 Ex 644 Pascoe v Canadian National Railway Company (1986) 69 BCLR 76 Sent v Jet Corporation of Australia Pty Ltd (1984) 2 FCR 201 Skoke-Grahame v R (1985) 16 DLR (4th) 321 Wakefield v Duke of Buccleuch (1866) LR 4 Eq 613 DECISION : See para 25
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate