NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Dinh v Commissioner of Corrective Services & Anor [2000] NSWSC 969 revised - 23/08/2001 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Administrative Law Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 30052/00 11/10/2000 HEARING DATE(S) : 12/10/2000 16/10/2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 27 October 2000
Duy Thai David Dinh (Pl/Appl) PARTIES : Commissioner of Corrective Services (1Def/Resp) Governor of the Metropolitan Remand & Reception Centre (2Def/Resp) JUDGMENT OF : Kirby J
COUNSEL : R Hoenig (Pl/Appl) N E Abadee (Defs/Resps) SOLICITORS : D J Humphreys - LAC (Pl/Appl) I V Knight - Crown Sol (Defs/Resps) CATCHWORDS : Summons seeking Declaration that designation of prisoner by the Commissioner was an improper exercise of power - Relevant and irrelevant considerations - Whether decision unreasonable LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Administration of Sentences) (Correctional Centre Routine) Regulation 1995 (NSW) Prisons (General) Amendment (Designation of High Security Inmates) Regulation 1999 (NSW) Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited (1985-86) 162 CLR 24 Associated Provincial Picture Houses Limited v Wednesbury Corporation (1948) 1 KB 223 Re W (an Infant) [1971] AC 682 CASES CITED : Parramatta City Council v Pestell (1972) 128 CLR 305 Bruce v Cole (1998) 45 NSWLR 163 Buck v Bavone (1976) 135 CLR 110 Minister for Immigration v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611 DECISION : Summons dismissed with costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate