NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : BRADY V BRADY [2001] NSWSC 547 revised - 29/06/2001 CURRENT JURISDICTION: EQUITY DIVISION FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1243/1999 HEARING DATE(S) : 27 - 28/06/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 29 June 2001
PARTIES : Michael Conor BRADY v Kathryn Lois BRADY - Estate of Desmond Michael BRADY, deceased. JUDGMENT OF : Acting Master Berecry at 1
COUNSEL : R.T.A. Waddell - plaintiff J. Wilson - defendant Teece, Hodgson & Ward - plaintiff SOLICITORS : Wm Walker Taylor Edwards & Smith - defendant CATCHWORDS : Short marriage - quality of the relationship - need for clear evidence of financial position - appropriate accommodation for widow. LEGISLATION CITED : Family Provision Act 1982 Singer v Burghouse (1994) 181 CLR 201 at 202 Pontifical Society for the Propagation of Faith v Scales (1992) 107 CLR 9 at 19 CASES CITED : Sellers v Public Trustee - unreported 8/2/89 Luciano v Rosenblum (1985) 2 NSWLR at 65 Elliott v Elliott (Powell J) DECISION : Additional provision be made out of the estate of the late Desmond Michael Brady for plaintiff by way of payment of a lump sum of $35,000;; Plaintiff's costs be paid out of the estate on the party/party basis;; Defendant's costs be paid out of the estate on the indemnity basis.
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
EQUITY DIVISION
ACTING MASTER BERECRY
FRIDAY, 29 JUNE, 2001 1243/99 - Michael Conor BRADY v Kathryn Lois BRADY - Estate of Desmond Michael BRADY, deceased. JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate