NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Banks v Ferrari & Ors [2000] NSWSC 874 revised - 4/09/2000 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 11699/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 02/02/00 07/08/00 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 August 2000
PARTIES : Beverley Joy Banks- Appellant Luisa Ferrari, John Fausto Ferrari and Ferrari Enterprises of Australia Pty Limited- Respondents JUDGMENT OF : Dowd J at 1
LOWER COURT Local Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 450/97 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Barkell M JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mrs Banks in person Mr Bellamy- Respondents SOLICITORS : Gordon Robilliard & Plowman Solicitors- Respondents CATCHWORDS : Justices Act 1902 (NSW) - Appeal - Detinue - Bailment - Rejection of subject property by Trustee in Bankruptcy - Entitlement to bring detinue proceedings Justices Act 1902 (NSW) Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED : Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) Corporations Law The Winkfield [1900-1903] All ER 346. Coleman v Harvey [1989] 1 NZLR 723. Bellinger v Autoland Pty Ltd [1962] VR 514. Timewell v Virgoe (1868) 5 WW&A'B L 147. EE McCurdy Ltd (In Liq) v Postmaster-General [1959] NZLR 553. Sutherland v Brien (Unreported, Austin J, 1 March 1999, Supreme Court of New South Wales). CanWest Global Communication Corporation v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1997-1998) 50 ALD 877. Re Mineral Securities Australia Ltd (In Liq) and the Companies Act (1973) 2 NSWLR 207. CASES CITED : Armory v Delamirie [1588-1774] All ER 121. Jeffries v Western Railway Co (1856) 5 E&B 802. Horne v Richardson (1970) 64 QJPR 47. Leake v Loveday and Brooks 134 ER 399. George Barker (Transport) Limited v Eynon (1974) 1 WLR 462. Majeau Carrying Company Pty Limited v Coastal Roftile Ltd (1972-1973) 129 CLR 48. Keene v Carter (1994) 12 WAR 20. Daemar Industrial Commission of NSW and Another (1990-1991) 22 NSWLR 178. O'Brien v Clyne and Another (1985-1986) 64 ALR 129. DECISION : 1. Plaintiff has an entitlement to possession of the goods listed in the original Statement of Claim; 2. Defendants to permit the plaintiff to arrange for the taking of possession of the subject goods, such taking of possesion to be at her own expense; 3. I defer for further argument the issue of damages; 4. Defendants to pay the costs of these proceedings; 5. Reserve the parties the right to list the matter before me for any matter that requires determination arising out of this judgment; 6. Judgment is stayed until fees owing by the plaintiff are paid, or the plaintiff satisfies the court as to why she should not pay them.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate