NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Meredith Projects v Fletcher Construction [2000] NSWSC 493 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 55026/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 22/05/00, 23/05/00, 24/05/00, 25/05/00, 29/05/00, 02/06/00, 07/06/00, 06/10/00, 11/10/00, 23/10/00 JUDGMENT DATE : 30 October 2000
PARTIES : Meredith Projects Pty Limited - Plaintiff Fletcher Construction Australia Limited - Defendant JUDGMENT OF : Rolfe J
COUNSEL : Mr P.R. Callaghan SC/Mr D.R. Sibtain - Plaintiff Mr M.D. Young - Defendant SOLICITORS : Clarks - Plaintiff Phillips Fox - Defendant CATCHWORDS : Refer attached LEGISLATION CITED : Refer attached CASES CITED : Refer attached DECISION : Judgment for the defendant
119
Construction Of A Guarantee Ankar Pty Limited v National Westminster Finance (Australia) Limited (1987) 162 CLR 549 Tricontinental CorporaTION V hdfi Limited (1987) 21 NSWLR 689 Bond v Hong Kong Bank of Australia Limited & Ors (1991) 25 NSWLR 286 Pan Foods Company Importers and Distributors Pty Limited v ANZ Banking Group Limited (2000) HCA 20 Sunbird Plaza Pty Limited v Maloney (1988) 166 CLR 245 Moschi v Lep Air Services Limited [1973] AC 331
The Existence Of Concurrent Liabilities In Contract And Tort Central Trust Co v Rafuse (1986) 51 DLR (4th) 481 Hawkins v Clayton & Ors (1988) 164 CLR 539 Pacific Associates Inc & Anor v Baxter & Ors [1990] 1QB 993 R.W. Miller & Co Pty Limited v Krupp (Australia) Pty Limited (Giles J - 9 June 1992 - unreported) Henderson & Ors v Merrett Syndicate Limited & Ors [1995] 2 AC 145 Bryant v Maloney (1995) 182 CLR 609 Astley v Austrust Limited (1999) 197 CLR 1
When the cause of action for negligent building work arises in circumstances where the plaintiff's claim is for damages for rectification, rather than economic loss Pirelli General Cable Works Limited v Oscar Faber & Partners [1983] 2AC 1 Hawkins v Clayton & Ors (1988) 164 CLR 539 Islander Trading Limited v Hogg Robinson Limited [1990] 1 All ER at p.831 Wardley Australia Limited & Anor v The State of Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 Christopoulos v Angelos (1996) 41 NSWLR 700 Held that the cause of action in contract was barred by the Limitation Act and, even if a cause of action in tort had been pleaded, it would also be barred.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate