NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Brown v DML Resources [2001] NSWSC 250 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3830/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 29 March 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 29 March 2001
Martin Russell Brown and Timothy James Cuming (P & R) PARTIES : DML Resources Pty Limited (In liquidation) (D1) DML Resources (WA) Pty Limited (In Liquidation) (D2) BP Australia Holdings Pty Ltd (A) JUDGMENT OF : Austin J
COUNSEL : A Carney (Sol) (A) C R C Newlinds (P & R) SOLICITORS : Carneys, Lawyers (A) Kemp Strang (P & R) CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - apprehended bias by judge - whether judge who makes ex parte order with leave to affected party to apply to set it aside should disqualify himself from hearing the application. Australian National Industries Ltd v Spedley Securities Ltd (1992) 26 NSWLR 411 Bainton v Rajski (1992) 29 NSWLR 539 Johnson v Johnson (2000) 74 ALJR 1380 Kartinyeri v The Commonwealth (No 2) (1998) 72 ALJR 1334 CASES CITED : Livesey v The New South Wales Bar Association (1983) 151 CLR 288 R v Australian Stevedoring Industry Board ex parte Melbourne Stevedoring Company Pty Limited (1953) 88 CLR 100 R v Commonwealth Conciliation & Arbitration Commission ex parte Angliss Group (1969) 122 CLR 546 R v Watson ex parte Armstrong (1976) 136 CLR 248 Re JRL ex parte CJL (1986) 161 CLR 342 Vakauta v Kelly (1989) 167 CLR 568 DECISION : Judge did not disqualify himself.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate